Viewing posts tagged ‘turnitin’

Elections, Past and Present

Mar 7, 08

Politics

tags

, , ,

Senate Elections

It’s been a few weeks since the Senate elections took place, but I never found time to write this entry. Unfortunately, I was not elected as a student senator, coming in 11th place, right on the line. The complete senate results are as follows (top 10 are elected).

Name Votes
Kevin Harding 701
Amanda van Baarsen 679
Natalie Bocking 647
Joe Paling 647
Haida Arsenault-Antolick 612
Earl Tapia 552
Camille MacDonald 539
Ravi Patel 529
Andrew Fergusson 527
Aman Bains 520
Me 456
Robin Steudel 450
Roberto Trasolini 435
Jason Chan 423
Anna Belkine 362

Anti-TII Publicity

Jan 29, 08

General

tags

, , ,

The fight against Turnitin.com is certainly easier if more students are aware of the issues and support the cause, this is why I wrote a 2000 word Peak article detailing the copyright and privacy issues as I know it. Wonder how many people will actually read it.

The Peak removed all the references from the article, so quotes are not properly attributed, or even attributed at all. Considering these were in-text references as opposed to footnotes (which I was told they won’t print), I’m kind of disappointed that they were not printed.

The article: The Peak | Original referenced draft

Thought Snippets

Oct 23, 07

General

tags

, ,

Exams

Why is it that every professor gives midterm exams within two weeks of every other professor? As if we’re all enrolled solely in their class and no other. Why are projects and papers all due at the same time as well? What’s so attractive about week twelve?!

Turnitin.com

Because of the aforementioned exams, I took an extended break from Turnitin.com issues. Here is a little update:

  • I mentioned earlier that the implied consent constitutes a contract. There is no need to go as far as to qualify the implied consent as such. To begin with, it is already unreasonable to require the wavier of civil liberties and intellectual property rights as a condition of enrolling in a course.

Responding to Profs

Aug 30, 07

Law & Justice

tags

,

Today is the second day of orientation, it was a very relaxed day, with many hours to kill between events. I decided to take advantage of that time and chat a little with Derrick Harder, current president of the Simon Fraser Student Society, who is also on the Senate, the Senate committee on Academic Integrity in Student Learning and Evaluation (SCAISLE), and the Board of Governors. The most relevant of which is SCAISLE, the committee is evaluating SFU’s Turnitin policy.

Of the various things that we discussed, I feel that everyone should know about the advice he gave regarding professors who currently employ Turnitin as an anti-plagiarism measure: If your professor requires its use, talk to him or her and tell them that you do not wish to submit your work to Turnitin.com. If they give you any trouble, refer him or her to Dr. Robert M. Gordon, who is a Professor of Criminology and chair of the SCAISLE.

Sorry prof, but I won’t Turnitin…

…and if you do, I’ll sue you, and I’ll win.

That’s what I’ll be telling any professors I might have who require the use of Turnitin.com, and I encourage you to do the same.

Turnitin.com is a plagiarism detection service used by many universities around the world, including in British Columbia: the University of British Columbia, Simon Fraser University, the University of Victoria, and the University of Northern British Columbia. In case you didn’t notice, that’s all the universities in the province.

I am not disputing the importance of academic honesty, in fact I agree wholeheartedly that plagiarism is a behaviour which cannot be allowed (honest students suffer from it after all). However using a service like Turnitin is not the proper method of enforcing said academic honesty. The service is built upon (and indeed thrives upon) immorality, hypocrisy, and likely illegality.